The ACA and Leaves of Absence for Full Time Status
Should health coverage end when an employee who has been working full-time moves to a part-time schedule?
Employers should avoid making eligibility decisions based solely on the employee's relationship to the individual.
When an employee asks to add a family member to benefits coverage, the answer may seem straightforward. A spouse is a spouse, a child is a child, and a dependent is a dependent. From a benefits administration standpoint, however, eligibility is not always that simple.
Who qualifies as an eligible dependent depends on the terms of the applicable plan and, for insured benefits, the insurance contract. Employers should avoid making eligibility decisions based solely on the employee’s relationship to the individual or assumptions about who should qualify.
The first place to look when determining dependent eligibility is the applicable plan document or insurance contract. Plans typically define the categories of dependents who may be covered and establish conditions that must be satisfied for each category.
Employers should also remember that different benefits may have different eligibility rules. An individual who qualifies as a dependent under an employer’s medical plan may not necessarily qualify under its dental, vision, life, accident, or other benefit plans.
Legally married spouses are commonly eligible for employer-sponsored coverage, but employers should still follow the applicable plan’s definition and documentation requirements.
Children can require additional attention. Depending on the plan and applicable law, eligible children may include biological children, adopted children, children placed for adoption, stepchildren, foster children, or other children with a specified relationship to the employee.
For medical plans subject to the Affordable Care Act’s dependent coverage requirements, if the plan offers dependent child coverage, that coverage generally must be available to children until age 26. Eligibility generally cannot be conditioned on factors such as whether the child is married, financially dependent on the employee, living with the employee, a student, or employed.
This does not mean, however, that every person an employee considers a “child” automatically qualifies. Employers still need to determine whether the individual falls within the plan’s definition of an eligible child.
Domestic partners deserve particular attention because employees may assume that a domestic partner is treated the same as a spouse.
There is no general federal requirement that an employer’s health plan cover domestic partners. If an employer offers domestic partner coverage, HR should review the plan’s definition and any requirements for establishing the relationship.
Tax treatment is a separate issue. A domestic partner who is eligible under the plan is not necessarily the employee’s tax dependent for federal tax purposes. As a result, coverage may be permitted under the plan while also creating taxable income for the employee.
Some plans allow a dependent child to remain covered beyond the plan’s normal limiting age when the child meets specified disability and dependency requirements.
These provisions should be administered carefully. The plan or carrier may require proof of disability within a particular period and may require additional certifications to continue coverage. HR should follow the applicable procedure rather than simply allowing an over-age dependent to remain enrolled because the employee reports that the child is disabled.
Grandchildren, legal wards, foster children, children under guardianship, and other family relationships can present more difficult eligibility questions.
An employee may financially support someone or consider that individual a member of the immediate family, but that does not necessarily make the person eligible for benefits. Conversely, a plan may expressly recognize certain relationships that are not immediately obvious to HR.
When the relationship does not clearly fall within a standard eligibility category, HR should review the actual plan terms before approving or denying enrollment.
Employers that require documentation to establish dependent eligibility should have a consistent process. Depending on the circumstances and plan requirements, documentation might include a marriage certificate, birth certificate, adoption documentation, domestic partner certification, or documentation supporting continued coverage of a disabled dependent.
Consistency matters. Similar eligibility situations should be handled under the same standards rather than requiring extensive documentation from one employee while accepting another employee’s representation without verification.
Another common source of confusion is assuming that “dependent” means the same thing for every purpose.
An individual may satisfy the eligibility requirements of an employer’s benefit plan without qualifying as the employee’s tax dependent under federal tax rules. The distinction can affect whether the value of employer-provided coverage is excluded from the employee’s taxable income.
HR should therefore treat benefit eligibility and tax treatment as separate questions when necessary.
Dependent eligibility is not necessarily permanent. Divorce, termination of a domestic partnership, a child’s age, changes affecting a disabled dependent, or other circumstances may cause an individual to lose eligibility.
Employers should have procedures for employees to promptly report changes affecting dependent eligibility and for those changes to be communicated to carriers and benefits administrators. Continuing coverage for an ineligible dependent can create premium, claims, payroll, and compliance problems.
Dependent eligibility should not be determined by assumption or simply by how a similar situation was handled in the past. When there is a question about whether a spouse, child, domestic partner, or other individual qualifies for coverage, HR should start with the eligibility provisions of the applicable plan and insurance contract.
A consistent process for reviewing and documenting dependent eligibility can help prevent ineligible enrollments, incorrect payroll deductions, coverage disputes, and problems when claims are submitted.
Benefit Allocation Systems (BAS) provides online solutions for: Employee Benefits Enrollment; COBRA; Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs); Health Reimbursement Accounts (HRAs); Leave of Absence Premium Billing (LOA); Affordable Care Act Record Keeping, Compliance & IRS Reporting (ACA); Group Insurance Premium Billing; Property & Casualty Premium Billing; and Payroll Integration.
MyEnroll360 integrates with major insurance carriers for enrollment eligibility management (e.g., Blue Cross, Blue Shield, Aetna, United Health Care, Kaiser, CIGNA and others), and with leading payroll platforms for enrollment deduction management (e.g., Workday, ADP, Paylocity, PayCor, UKG, and others).
This article is for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal, tax, or benefits advice. Readers should not rely on this information for taking (or not taking) any action relating to employment, compliance, or benefits. Always consult with a qualified professional before making decisions based on this content.